.png)
.png)
.png)
send him to a local college/university to spend time with them during their Spring Ball.It would sound like he knows the defense and (may) know the opponent, but doesn't understand the application / rationale behind what he is calling.It would help in many ways;1) You are empowering him to take the next step (not telling him to do something)2) He will network with other minds (may be more receptive of other coaches input)3) He will see it is more than just slapping stuff together, but focusing on situational defense versus particular threats.
one other comment....I don't know what your relationship is like, but if it is half way decent, I would challenge him as much as possible in relaxed settings. Break out the bar napkins.Every defensive guy is the next Buddy Ryan when you're just lining up against Pro sets....but what happens when you are facing {censored} sets or challenging personnel, now what!?Try to break his mousetrap.What will he do now? He will have to rethink his approach, why he is doing what he does, and galvanize his defensive philosophy.Again about the rhythm stuff, it is one thing to get the read-out of stats, but how much time does he use to watch what his opponent is doing during the course of a game? What is the OC doing in tough spots? What does he go back to? What is he trying to set up? Those are things you can pick up through pattern-recognition, by watching a full game and watching it progress. So if you're watching 3 or 5 games on Joe Blow OC, now you're up in the box....you can have a deja vu feel for what is coming next.The only caveat I would offer, though, is don't get in the rut of trying to beat the OC, but rather just beat the QB. Understand the offense, so that you CAN do that (frustrate blocking rules, RB in protection, route-combos, QB reads, etc).Thanks for the practice outline......that might be half the battle, though.Script EVERYTHING. You (and your staff) should package your opponent based on all those fancy stats/tendencies. In doing so, your kid should associate certain plays / formations with specific tendencies. If you approach practice by slapping {censored} together, the kids will play like they are slapping {censored} together, and consequently, it will look like the defense is being called like we're just slapping {censored} together.Lastly, does the DC grade the performances of his players (quantify their assignment execution)?
the bottom line is how efficient or practical is this concept for your predicament? Can you assess it on your own? What will it take for it to be effective? How could you screw it up?The 'coverage' concept is the basic premise a DC would use as an acid test to measure the practicality of kids in positions to do their job. It is what marries everything you are doing together, instead of a handful of ideas thrown together with none of the players working together.You have 8 gaps to defend - how are you going to shut them all down?If any one of those 8 gaps isn't defended, your entire defense is compromised.Do you want guys double-dipping in responsibility to ensure that these gaps are covered? If so, then what is your idiot-proof plan to teach these 5 defenders to read block reactions (to put them in the appropriate gap support)?It would be apparent that you have a passion for the new-wave defense of the 3-3 and its flexibility, and maybe you're a fan of the Specht defense, or whatever......but what is it going to do for you? That is the question that is most important. The defense's versatility and ability to adapt is great....but by the sounds of it, you don't really have a whole lot to adapt to - teams are basically doing a very few things offensively. If that is the case, where is the value in being 'versatile' / multiple, if you never have to adapt to something different each week?The front / blitz is just a delivery method....a tool to accomplish something specific - nothing else. What are the biggest weaknesses of this method, and how do you plan to account for it?The wedge was brought up......how are you planning on dealing with it?Unbalanced? Option (or belly series)?....what is the "right" gap fit, when you get 2-3 threats on a given play?What are you really gaining with the head-up alignment? IMO, you play with fire here, because you are adding a greater chance to get reached, nulifying the slant, and worse yet - putting the player in a situation where he is handicapped to get his job done. If you have some beasts at the DL spots, have at it, but for the average player, I believe the above holds true more often than not. If you want the kid responsible for B gap....then put him in B gap, and eliminate the variables that would prevent him from doing that job.The only point is.....if you are relying on 3 stacked backers to make reads - how do you intend to teach it, because that might be a lot for MS kids to get 'right' a majority of downs.If you're just slanting and brining those 3 guys every play.....what are you really gaining, and does this do more harm than good for the future development of those players (because they really aren't learning any fundamental skills for the position)?good luck
so you changed the coverage, and it affected the front......interesting.
one other comment....I don't know what your relationship is like, but if it is half way decent, I would challenge him as much as possible in relaxed settings. Break out the bar napkins.Every defensive guy is the next Buddy Ryan when you're just lining up against Pro sets....but what happens when you are facing {censored} sets or challenging personnel, now what!?Try to break his mousetrap.What will he do now? He will have to rethink his approach, why he is doing what he does, and galvanize his defensive philosophy.Again about the rhythm stuff, it is one thing to get the read-out of stats, but how much time does he use to watch what his opponent is doing during the course of a game? What is the OC doing in tough spots? What does he go back to? What is he trying to set up? Those are things you can pick up through pattern-recognition, by watching a full game and watching it progress. So if you're watching 3 or 5 games on Joe Blow OC, now you're up in the box....you can have a deja vu feel for what is coming next.The only caveat I would offer, though, is don't get in the rut of trying to beat the OC, but rather just beat the QB. Understand the offense, so that you CAN do that (frustrate blocking rules, RB in protection, route-combos, QB reads, etc).Thanks for the practice outline......that might be half the battle, though.Script EVERYTHING. You (and your staff) should package your opponent based on all those fancy stats/tendencies. In doing so, your kid should associate certain plays / formations with specific tendencies. If you approach practice by slapping {censored} together, the kids will play like they are slapping {censored} together, and consequently, it will look like the defense is being called like we're just slapping {censored} together.Lastly, does the DC grade the performances of his players (quantify their assignment execution)?
the bottom line is how efficient or practical is this concept for your predicament? Can you assess it on your own? What will it take for it to be effective? How could you screw it up?The 'coverage' concept is the basic premise a DC would use as an acid test to measure the practicality of kids in positions to do their job. It is what marries everything you are doing together, instead of a handful of ideas thrown together with none of the players working together.You have 8 gaps to defend - how are you going to shut them all down?If any one of those 8 gaps isn't defended, your entire defense is compromised.Do you want guys double-dipping in responsibility to ensure that these gaps are covered? If so, then what is your idiot-proof plan to teach these 5 defenders to read block reactions (to put them in the appropriate gap support)?It would be apparent that you have a passion for the new-wave defense of the 3-3 and its flexibility, and maybe you're a fan of the Specht defense, or whatever......but what is it going to do for you? That is the question that is most important. The defense's versatility and ability to adapt is great....but by the sounds of it, you don't really have a whole lot to adapt to - teams are basically doing a very few things offensively. If that is the case, where is the value in being 'versatile' / multiple, if you never have to adapt to something different each week?The front / blitz is just a delivery method....a tool to accomplish something specific - nothing else. What are the biggest weaknesses of this method, and how do you plan to account for it?The wedge was brought up......how are you planning on dealing with it?Unbalanced? Option (or belly series)?....what is the "right" gap fit, when you get 2-3 threats on a given play?What are you really gaining with the head-up alignment? IMO, you play with fire here, because you are adding a greater chance to get reached, nulifying the slant, and worse yet - putting the player in a situation where he is handicapped to get his job done. If you have some beasts at the DL spots, have at it, but for the average player, I believe the above holds true more often than not. If you want the kid responsible for B gap....then put him in B gap, and eliminate the variables that would prevent him from doing that job.The only point is.....if you are relying on 3 stacked backers to make reads - how do you intend to teach it, because that might be a lot for MS kids to get 'right' a majority of downs.If you're just slanting and brining those 3 guys every play.....what are you really gaining, and does this do more harm than good for the future development of those players (because they really aren't learning any fundamental skills for the position)?good luck
so you changed the coverage, and it affected the front......interesting.
so would it be correct to assume you just want the front line to get penetration and keep moving, thereby constricting the running lanes for the 2nd level personnel?
now out of the two-high look in your 3-3.....lets say you have
----X---O--O--[-]--O--O---Y----------
-------------Q---------------Z-------
----H-------F--------------------
and toss action right....what are you telling those safeties to do?And what if X is doing his usual reach steps and takes it up field vertically stemming inside in the deep hole....for play-action pass (or vis versa with Y)? What are those safeties 'supposed' to do? What are you teaching them is the RIGHT move?
the only reason I ask is because it could affect how you teach those guys, with respect to how they fit in with the rest of the scheme.You can say, "line up at 10 yards, and attack any action your way!".....what is the backside responsibility of that other safety?.....how can they screw up?You can say "you just play it by feel out there, just come up for the run!"then when you have the backside dig opening up, or play-action post pop open (and none of your guys within 10 yards of him), you'll be screaming"DAMMIT, BILLY THATS YOUR GUY!!!"
.png)
No comments: